Llama 4 Maverick: healthcare benchmark results
Meta · 3 boards · snapshot reviewed September 28, 2026
The index currently holds 3 results for Llama 4 Maverick: 36.51% on MedCode (Vals AI) (73 of 102 indexed rows), 54.22% on MedScribe (Vals AI) (102 of 104 indexed rows), 42.1% on WHBench (17 of 22 indexed rows). Scores below sit on different scales and come from different graders, so read each against its own benchmark, never against the others.
Results by benchmark
| benchmark | score | index position | as of |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedCode (Vals AI) model ID fireworks/llama4-maverick-instruct-basic; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; standard error 1.994 pp; $0.002888/test; source snapshot 2026-09-26; run date not published | 36.51% | 73 of 102 | 2026-09-26 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) model ID fireworks/llama4-maverick-instruct-basic; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; standard error 1.871 pp; $0.002460/test; source snapshot 2026-09-26; run date not published | 54.22% | 102 of 104 | 2026-09-26 |
| WHBench 95% bootstrap CI 39.6–44.6; 3 runs; temperature 0; zero-shot, closed-book via paper, arxiv.org | 42.1% | 17 of 22 | 2026-03 |
Position follows the rows held in this index and is not a controlled comparison. Sources may use different graders or task subsets. Positions include separate configurations. A source board may contain additional rows; its size is listed separately when it differs. Config caveats, where a source noted any, are on each benchmark's page, and the document behind each score is cited on the sources page.
Which healthcare benchmarks is Llama 4 Maverick scored on?
As of September 28, 2026, Llama 4 Maverick has indexed results on 3 tracked benchmarks: MedCode (Vals AI), MedScribe (Vals AI), WHBench.
Which results are indexed for Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick stands at 36.51% on MedCode (Vals AI) (73 of 102 indexed rows), 54.22% on MedScribe (Vals AI) (102 of 104 indexed rows), 42.1% on WHBench (17 of 22 indexed rows).
The benchmarks themselves are described on their pages, linked in the table above, and the whole field is on the index.